Geotechnical Behaviour of Gypseous Soil Treated by Geopolymer Additives

https://doi.org/10.24237/djes.2023.160409

Authors

  • Tanya Ekram Mahmood Department of Civil Engineering, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk, Iraq
  • Majid Hussein Hamed Department of Civil Engineering, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk, Iraq
  • Ali Kadhim Ibrahim Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mustansiriyah, Baghdad, Iraq

Keywords:

Gypseous soil, Shear strength, Geopolymer, Compressibility, Collapsibility

Abstract

Gypseous soil is well-known for its numerous engineering problems. When this soil is exposed to water, the gypsum in the soil dissolves, causing the buildings built on it to collapse; so, treating gypseous soil is important for improving its engineering characteristics. The present paper focuses on studying the effect of adding geopolymer on mechanical characteristics of gypseous soil. This study presents the results obtained from a series of experimental tests, including direct shear, consolidation, and collapsibility tests. Tests were conducted on samples of gypseous soil taken from depth 1.5 meters below ground level with gypsum content of 41%. The geopolymer was used in three different molarities for the collapse test (10M, 12M, and 14M) and a 14 molarity only for the shear and consolidation tests, where equal proportions of fly ash were combined with an alkaline activator that was composed of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate. The binder (fly ash + alkaline) to the soil was added to the treated samples during mixing at a rate of 20% by weight. The findings showed that treating the soil with geopolymer leads to a notable enhancement in the angle of internal friction of the soil particles from (37 to 42) degrees. as well as a reduction in the soil compressibility and a reduction in the susceptibility of the soil to collapse, with an improvement degree of 64% when using a geopolymer with a molarity of 14 M. This improvement was achieved by using a geopolymer with a higher concentration of NaOH. The best results were achieved when a geopolymer with a molarity of 14 was used, which is the ideal ratio.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. M. Al-Mohammadi, I. H. Nashat, and G. Y. Basko, “Compressibility and collapse of gypseous soils,” in Proceeding of the 8th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1987, vol. 1, pp. 151–154.

M. Fattah, M. Al-Obaydi, and F. Abdullah, “Effect of Number of Piles on Load Sharing in Piled Raft Foundation System in Saturated Gypseous Soil,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., vol. 9, Mar. 2018.

A. A. Al-Mufty, “Effect of gypsum dissolution on the mechanical behavior of gypseous soils,” Ph. D. Thesis, Civil Eng. Dep., University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq, 1997.

A. D. Al-Morshedy, “The use of cut-back MC-30 for controlling the collapsibility of gypseous soils.” M. Sc. Thesis, Building and Construction Department, University of Technology, 2001.

A. F. Barzanji, “Gypsiferous soils of Iraq,” Ph.D thesis,Ghent University. Belgium, 1973.

S. H. Abid-Awn, “Improvement of gypseous soils using locally manufactured reinforcement materials,” Univ. Technolgy, 1996.

V. P. Petrukhin and G. B. Boldyrev, “Investigation of the de formability of gypsofied soils by a static load,” Soil Mech. Found. Eng., vol. 15, pp. 178–182, 1978.

E. A. Al-Zory, “The effect of leaching on lime stabilized gypseous soil,” Master’s Thesis, Univ. Mousl, Iraq, 1993.

N. Moayyeri, M. Oulapour, and A. Haghighi, “Study of geotechnical properties of a gypsiferous soil treated with lime and silica fume,” Geomech. Eng, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 195–206, 2019.

A. N. Ibrahim and T. Schanz, “Gypseous soil improvement by silicone oil,” Al-Nahrain J. Eng. Sci., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 49–58, 2017.

H. Y. Aziz and J. Ma, “Gypseous soil improvement using fuel oil,” World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 51, pp. 299–303, 2011.

B. G. Esho, “Stabilization of gypseous soils by lime and emulsified asphalt.” M. Sc. Thesis, College of Engineering, University of Mousl, 2004.

M. Y. Fattah, M. M. Al-Ani, and M. T. A. Al-Lamy, “Treatment of collapse of gypseous soils by grouting,” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Improv., vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 32–43, 2013.

M. K. Mohsen, Q. A. Al-Obaidi, and A. O. Asker, “Improving the Gypseous Soil Bearing Capacity Using Geotextile Reinforcement Under Dry Condition,” in Geotechnical Engineering and Sustainable Construction: Sustainable Geotechnical Engineering, Springer, 2022, pp. 3–13.

K. Gaspard and Z. Zhang, “Assessment of Shrinkage Crack Mitigation Technique Performance in Soil Cement Base Courses,” 2009.

Z. Ma and L. Wang, “Technical Progress of Emission-reduction and Utilization of Carbon Dioxide in Cement Industry [J],” Mater. Rev., vol. 25, no. 19, pp. 150–154, 2011.

J. Zhang et al., “Properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer-based grouts,” Ceram. - Silikaty, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 164–173, 2019, doi: 10.13168/cs.2019.0008.

P. Duxson, A. Fernández-Jiménez, J. L. Provis, G. C. Lukey, A. Palomo, and J. S. J. van Deventer, “Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art,” J. Mater. Sci., vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 2917–2933, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z.

N. A. Odeh and A. H. J. Al-Rkaby, “Strength, Durability, and Microstructures characterization of sustainable geopolymer improved clayey soil,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 16, no. November 2021, p. e00988, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00988.

M. Zhang, H. Guo, T. El-Korchi, G. Zhang, and M. Tao, “Experimental feasibility study of geopolymer as the next-generation soil stabilizer,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 47, pp. 1468–1478, 2013.

I. Phummiphan, S. Horpibulsuk, P. Sukmak, A. Chinkulkijniwat, A. Arulrajah, and S.-L. Shen, “Stabilisation of marginal lateritic soil using high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer,” Road Mater. Pavement Des., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 877–891, 2016.

C. Teerawattanasuk and P. Voottipruex, “Comparison between cement and fly ash geopolymer for stabilized marginal lateritic soil as road material,” Int. J. Pavement Eng., vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1264–1274, 2019.

J. M. Abbas, A. M. Ibrahim, and A. M. Shihab, “Investigation to some preliminary geotechnical properties of soft clay stabilized by fly ash based geopolymers,” Key Eng. Mater., vol. 857, pp. 259–265, 2020.

S. O. Abdulkareem and J. M. Abbas, “Effect of Adding Metakaolin Based Geopolymer to Improve Soft Clay under Different Conditions,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, vol. 856, no. 1, p. 12011.

ASTM C-618-03, “Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use,” Annu. B. ASTM Stand., vol. 04, no. C, pp. 3–6, 2003.

M. Hamed, W. Sidik, H. Canakci, F. Celik, and R. Georgees, “Characterization of Shear Strength and Interface Friction of Organic Soil,” Key Eng. Mater., pp. 2019–2031, Oct. 2019.

ASTMD3080, “Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained,” pp. 1–7, 2007, doi: 10.1520/D3080.

ASTMD2435-04, “standard test methods for one-dimentional consolidation properties of soils using incremental loading,” (ASTM Int. West Conshohocken, PA, United States, 2004.

ASTMD5333, “Standard test method for measurement of collapse potential of soils (Withdrawn 2012),” ASTM Int. West Conshohocken, PA., 2003.

BS1377, “Bs 1377: 1990. Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes. Part 1: General Requirements and Sample Preparation,” Br. Stand., pp. 4–5, 1990.

ASTM International, “ASTM 698-07: Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)),” ASTM Int., vol. 3, p. 15, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://www.resolutionmineeis.us/sites/default/files/references/astm-D698.pdf

P. American Society for Testing and Materials (Filadelfia, “ASTM D2487-17e1: Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (unified Soil Classification System),” 2017.

A. A. Al-Mufty and I. H. Nashat, “Gypsum content determination in gypseous soils and rocks,” in 3rd International Jordanian Conference on Mining, 2000, vol. 2, pp. 485–492.

S. Rios, N. Cristelo, A. Viana da Fonseca, and C. Ferreira, “Structural performance of alkali-activated soil ash versus soil cement,” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., vol. 28, no. 2, p. 4015125, 2016.

M. Corrêa-Silva, N. Araújo, N. Cristelo, T. Miranda, A. T. Gomes, and J. Coelho, “Improvement of a clayey soil with alkali activated low-calcium fly ash for transport infrastructures applications,” Road Mater. Pavement Des., vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1912–1926, 2019.

A. H. J. Al-Rkaby, “Evaluating shear strength of sand-GGBFS based geopolymer composite material,” Acta Polytech., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 305–311, 2019.

K. Somna, C. Jaturapitakkul, P. Kajitvichyanukul, and P. Chindaprasirt, “NaOH-activated ground fly ash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature,” Fuel, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 2118–2124, 2011.

G. Liang, H. Zhu, Z. Zhang, Q. Wu, and J. Du, “Investigation of the waterproof property of alkali-activated metakaolin geopolymer added with rice husk ash,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 230, pp. 603–612, 2019.

S. Saha and C. Rajasekaran, “Enhancement of the properties of fly ash based geopolymer paste by incorporating ground granulated blast furnace slag,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 146, pp. 615–620, 2017.

I. H. Nashat, “‘Engineering Characteristics of Some Gypseous Soils in Iraq,’” ph.D thesis ,Civil Engineering Department, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq, 1990. doi: 10.1099/ 00221287-136-2-327.

S. F. I. Al-Abdullah, “The upper limits of gypseous salts in the clay core of Al-Adhaim dam,” Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Baghdad, 1995.

S. Alsafi, N. Farzadnia, A. Asadi, and B. K. Huat, “Collapsibility potential of gypseous soil stabilized with fly ash geopolymer; characterization and assessment,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 137, pp. 390–409, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.079.

Published

2023-12-15

How to Cite

[1]
T. E. Mahmood, M. Hussein Hamed, and A. K. Ibrahim, “Geotechnical Behaviour of Gypseous Soil Treated by Geopolymer Additives ”, DJES, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 110–119, Dec. 2023.