Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analysis of an LNG-Assisted CCHP Plant with LiBr/Water ARC

Authors

  • Saadoon Abdul Hafedh Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Diyala, Baquba, Diyala Province, Iraq.
  • Layth Abed Hasnawi Al-Rubaye Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Diyala, Baquba, Diyala Province, Iraq.
  • Faramarz Ranjbar Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
  • Moharram Jafari Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24237/djes.2025.18412

Keywords:

LNG regasification, Cold energy recovery, CCHP, Waste heat recovery, Absorption refrigeration (LiBr/Water ARC).

Abstract

This study proposes a novel liquefied-natural-gas-assisted combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) plant in which the cryogenic energy released during regasification is cascaded through a closed nitrogen Brayton cold-box, medium-temperature heat is coupled to a toluene organic Rankine cycle (ORC), and a lithium-bromide/water absorption refrigeration cycle (ARC) provides cooling while domestic hot water at 60 °C is recovered. A comprehensive steady-state model was developed in Engineering Equation Solver (EES) and benchmarked against three published data sets; the largest deviations were 2.8% for the gas-turbine block and 0.3% for the chiller, confirming the model’s reliability. Energy and exergy balances were solved simultaneously for every component, enabling consistent comparison of power-only, CHP, and CCHP modes for a 160-MW-class plant. Under nominal conditions the system delivers 168.8 MW net power, 11.7 MW cooling, and 143.7 kg/s hot water, with energy and exergy efficiencies of 93.2% and 51%, respectively. Parametric sweeps of combustor outlet temperature, compressor pressure ratio, LNG regasification pressure, and heat exchanger pinch points expose design trade-offs, pinpoint a practical 6–7 MPa regasification-pressure window, and versus a recent benchmark lift exergy efficiency from 41% to 51% (~24% gain) while cutting specific fuel consumption by 18% at equal net power. These improvements are achieved without exotic working fluids or deep cryogenic stages, making the concept deployable with current hardware. The integrated methodology and data set form a transferable benchmark for future LNG-based energy hubs and highlight clear upgrade paths most notably staged combustion and advanced heat-exchanger networks to push performance even further.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Javaherian A, Ghasemi S, Seyed Mahmoudi SM, Rosen MA, Sadeghi M. Two-Objective Optimization of a Cogeneration System Based on a Gas Turbine Integrated with Solar-Assisted Rankine and Absorption Refrigeration Cycles. Sustainability 2023;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115624.

[2] Zeinali M, Sharifi A, Ranjbar F. Thermodynamic analysis of sustainable electric power production using solar tower during day and syngas combustion from municipal waste gasification during night. Energy Equip Syst 2023;11:277–304. https://doi.org/10.22059/ees.2023.1999210.1421.

[3] Sharafi laleh S, Zeinali M, Mahmoudi SMS, Soltani S, Rosen MA. Biomass co-fired combined cycle with hydrogen production via proton exchange membrane electrolysis and waste heat recovery: Thermodynamic assessment. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023;48:33795–809. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.137.

[4] Ghiami Sardroud R, Javaherian A, Seyed Mahmoudi SM, Akbari Kordlar M, Rosen MA. Proposal and Comprehensive Analysis of a Novel Combined Plant with Gas Turbine and Organic Flash Cycles: An Application of Multi-Objective Optimization. Sustainability 2023;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914152.

[5] Cao Y, Dhahad HA, Togun H, Anqi AE, Farouk N, Farhang B. Proposal and thermo-economic optimization of using LNG cold exergy for compressor inlet cooling in an integrated biomass fueled triple combined power cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2021;46:15351–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.02.111.

[6] Khanmohammadi S, Soyturk G, Kizilkan O. Thermal performance evaluation and multi-objective optimization of a hybrid system integrating biogas gas turbine, CO2 cycles, cold energy recovery, cooling and hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2025. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.224.

[7] Yousef MS, Hawwash AA, Santana D. Assessment of a sustainable multigeneration system integrating supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle and LNG regasification: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic evaluation. Case Stud Therm Eng 2024;56:104205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.104205.

[8] Tsatsaronis G, Morosuk T. Advanced exergetic analysis of a novel system for generating electricity and vaporizing liquefied natural gas. Energy 2010;35:820–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.08.019.

[9] Yehia F, Al-Haimi AANM, Byun Y, Kim J, Yun Y, Lee G, et al. Integration of the single-effect mixed refrigerant cycle with liquified air energy storage and cold energy of LNG regasification: Energy, exergy, and efficiency prospectives. Energy 2024;306:132567. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132567.

[10] Xu Z, Huang J, Muhammad T, Agrawal MK, Ayadi M, Ahmed MA, et al. Design and comprehensive thermo-enviro-economic assessment of an innovative polygeneration system using biomass fuel and LNG regasification: A CCHP-thermally desalination application. Process Saf Environ Prot 2024;183:925–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.01.040.

[11] Zhao T, Ahmad SF, Agrawal MK, Ahmad Bani Ahmad AY, Ghfar AA, Valsalan P, et al. Design and thermo-enviro-economic analyses of a novel thermal design process for a CCHP-desalination application using LNG regasification integrated with a gas turbine power plant. Energy 2024;295:131003. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131003.

[12] Liu M, Lior N, Zhang N, Han W. Thermoeconomic analysis of a novel zero-CO2-emission high-efficiency power cycle using LNG coldness. Energy Convers Manag 2009;50:2768–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.06.033.

[13] Liang P, Guo Y, Chauhdary ST, Agrawal MK, Ahmad SF, Bani Ahmad AYA, et al. Sustainable development and multi-aspect analysis of a novel polygeneration system using biogas upgrading and LNG regasification processes, producing power, heating, fresh water and liquid CO2. Process Saf Environ Prot 2024;183:417–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.01.003.

[14] Salehi S, Javanfam F. Investigation of a novel solar-assisted multigeneration system comprising water desalination systems, an absorption refrigeration system, a single-effect absorption heat transformer and two organic Rankine cycles. Heliyon 2024;10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36452.

[15] Emadi MA, Mahmoudimehr J. Modeling and thermo-economic optimization of a new multi-generation system with geothermal heat source and LNG heat sink. Energy Convers Manag 2019;189:153–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.03.086.

[16] Taheri MH, Mosaffa AH, Farshi LG. Energy, exergy and economic assessments of a novel integrated biomass based multigeneration energy system with hydrogen production and LNG regasification cycle. Energy 2017;125:162–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.124

[17] Hu Y, Badrawi SI, Kumar J, Sabeh HN, Alsenani TR, Riaz F, et al. Gas turbine-based system taking advantage of LNG regasification process for multigeneration purposes; Techno-economic-environmental analysis and machine learning optimization. Process Saf Environ Prot 2023;179:10–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.08.068.

[18] Hamada KI, Mohammed MN, Jasim RR, Ibrahim TK. Energy and exergy analyses of a combined power plant based on natural gas combustion. Tikrit J Eng Sci 2023;30(3):17–26. https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.30.3.3

[19] Mohammed MK, Al Doori WH, Jassim AH, Ibrahim TK, Al-Sammarraie AT. Energy and exergy analysis of the steam power plant based on effect the numbers of feed water heater. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci 2019;56(2):211–222.

[20] Moran MJ, Shapiro HN, Boettner DD, Bailey MB. Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, 9th Edition EPUB Reg Card Loose-Leaf Print Companion Set. Wiley; 2018.

[21] Xia G, Sun Q, Cao X, Wang J, Yu Y, Wang L. Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a solar-powered transcritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) power cycle for reverse osmosis desalination based on the recovery of cryogenic energy of LNG (liquefied natural gas). Energy 2014;66:643–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.029.

[22] Pátek J, Klomfar J. A computationally effective formulation of the thermodynamic properties of LiBr–H2O solutions from 273 to 500 K over full composition range. Int J Refrig 2006;29:566–78.

[23] Pátek J, Klomfar J. A simple formulation for thermodynamic properties of steam from 273 to 523 K, explicit in temperature and pressure. Int J Refrig 2009;32:1123–5.

[24] Şencan A, Yakut KA, Kalogirou SA. Exergy analysis of lithium bromide/water absorption systems. Renew Energy 2005;30:645–57.

[25] Gomri R. Second law comparison of single effect and double effect vapour absorption refrigeration systems. Energy Convers Manag 2009;50:1279–87.

[26] Yan X, Chen G, Hong D, Lin S, Tang L. A novel absorption refrigeration cycle for heat sources with large temperature change. Appl Therm Eng 2013;52:179–86.

[27] Rujing Y, Wang J, Cheng Y, Ma C, Yu T. Thermodynamic analysis of fuel cell combined cooling heating and power system integrated with solar reforming of natural gas. Sol Energy 2020;206:396–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.05.085.

[28] Palacios-Bereche R, Gonzales R, Nebra SA. Exergy calculation of lithium bromide–water solution and its application in the exergetic evaluation of absorption refrigeration systems LiBr-H2O. Int J Energy Res 2012;36:166–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1790.

[29] Wu Z, Zhu P, Yao J, Zhang S, Ren J, Yang F, et al. Combined biomass gasification, SOFC, IC engine, and waste heat recovery system for power and heat generation: Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, environmental (4E) evaluations. Appl Energy 2020;279:115794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115794.

[30] Wonchala J, Hazledine M, Goni Boulama K. Solution procedure and performance evaluation for a water–LiBr absorption refrigeration machine. Energy 2014;65:272–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.087.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

How to Cite

[1]
“Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analysis of an LNG-Assisted CCHP Plant with LiBr/Water ARC”, DJES, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 165–181, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.24237/djes.2025.18412.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 277

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.