Performance of Various Electrical Resistivity Configurations for Detecting Buried Tunnels Using 2D Electrical Resistivity Tomography Modelling

https://doi.org/10.24237/djes.2018.11303

Authors

  • Asem Ahmed Hassan Department of Petroleum and Minerals Geology, College of Science, University of Diyala, Iraq
  • Emad Hamid Kadhim Department of Petroleum and Minerals Geology, College of Science, University of Diyala, Iraq
  • Muaiad Tahir Ahmed Department of Petroleum and Minerals Geology, College of Science, University of Diyala, Iraq

Keywords:

Electrical Resistivity Tomography, Configuration, Tunnel, Noise

Abstract

This work aims to evaluate performance of 2D electrical resistivity modelling technique for detecting buried tunnels using various electrode configurations. A synthetic resistivity model was designed to explore the capability of Wenner, Wenner- Schlumberger, Dipole-Dipole, Pole-Dipole and Pole-Pole electrode configurations for detecting buried tunnels at different noise levels. 2D forward modelling (RES2DMOD) and 2D inversion (RES2DINV) software were implemented using blocky L1 norm optimization method. The results showed that the modelled tunnel can clearly be detected at 0% noise level due to the high resistivity contrast between the synthetic tunnel and the surrounding host materials. At 0-30% noise levels, the results indicated that dipole-dipole and Wenner- Schlumberger in the second order perform better than other configurations. This can be attributed to the characteristics features and sensitivity of these configurations for resolving the subsurface resistivity changes. It is suggested that these configurations are more suitable for detecting the buried structures. The results also showed that the inversion artifacts caused by high noise levels may smear the resistivity signature of the burred targets for particular configurations. Thus, obtaining high quality data ensures reliable resistivity interpretations. The study demonstrated the usefulness of the 2D numerical modelling for planning of electrical resistivity surveys.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. Sudha, K., Israil, M., Mittal, S., and J., Rai. Soil characterization using electrical resistivity tomography and geotechnical investigations. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 67, (2009), 74-79.

. Ayolabi, E. A., Enoh, I. JE and A. F. Folorunso. Engineering Site Characterisation Using 2-D and 3-D Electrical Resistivity Tomography, Earth Science Research; 2, (1), (2013), 133-142.

. Karim, H. H., Al-Neami, M. A., and W. M. Y. Mohammad. Soil Site Investigations Using 2D Resistivity Imaging Technique, Eng. & Tech. Journal ,31 ,Part (A), (16), (2013), 3125-3146.

. Schoor, V. M. Detection of sinkholes using 2D electrical resistivity imaging. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 50(4), ( 2002), 393-399.

. Chávez, R. E., Cifuentes-Nava G., Tejero, A., Hernández-Quintero, J. E., and D., Vargas. Special 3D electric resistivity tomography (ERT) array applied to detect buried fractures on urban areas: San Antonio Tecómitl, Milpa Alta, México, Geofísica Internacional, 53-4: (2014), 425-434.

. Abed, A. M. and Thabit, J. M. Delineation of K-3 Cavity Using 2D Imaging Resistivity Technique in Haditha Area (Western Iraq), Iraqi Journal of Science, 57, (1A), (2016), 209-217.

. Al- Kubbaysi, K. K., Electrical resistivity sections by different electrodes configuration in the west of Razzaza (south west Karbala), MSc. thesis (unpublished), College of Science, University of Baghdad, 1989.

. Zhou, W., Beck, B. F. and A. L., Adams. Effective electrode array in mapping karst hazards in electrical resistivitytomography. Environmental geology, 42(8), (2002), 922-928.

. Ali, K. K. Determination of faults positions by resistivity measurements by using different electrodes arrays. Proceeding of 3rd scientific conference of College of Science, University of Baghdad, (2009), 1883-1894.

. Metwaly, M. and F., AlFouzan. Application of 2-D geoelectrical resistivity tomography for subsurface cavity detection in the eastern part of Saudi Arabia. Geoscience Frontiers, 4(4), (2013), 469-476.

. Thabit , J. M. and A.S., Al-Zubedi. Evaluation of Three Important Electrode Arrays in Defining the Vertical and Horizontal Structures in 2D Imaging Surveys, Iraqi Journal of Science, 56, (2B), (2015), 1465-1470.

. Loke, M. H., Acworth, I. and T., Dahlin, A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys. Exploration Geophysics, 34, (2003), 182-187.

. Loke, M. H. Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys, Geotomo Software, Malaysia, (2016), 207

. Sasaki, Y. Two-dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole-dipole resistivity data. Geophysics, 54, (1989), 174-187.

. Loke M. H. and R. D., Barker. Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting, 44, (1996), 131–152.

. Griffiths, D. H. and R.D. Barker. Two dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 29, (1993), 211–226.

. Seaton W. J., and T.J., Burbey. Evaluation of two-dimensional resistivity methods in a fractured crystalline rock terrane. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 51, (2002), 21-41.

. Dahlin, T. and B., Zhou. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays, Geophysical Prospecting, 52, (2004), 379–398.

. Yang, X. and M.B., Lagmanson. Planning resistivity surveys using numerical simulations. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium for the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, San Antonio, Texas: Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, (2003), 488-501.

. Loke, M. H. RES2DMOD ver. 3.01: Rapid 2D resistivity forward modeling using the finite-difference and finite-element methods, Geotomo Software, Malaysia, (2014), 23.

. Dey, A. and H.F. Morrison. Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped two-dimensional structures. Geophysical Prospecting, 27, (1979), 106-136.

. Loke, M. H. RES2DINV ver. 3.71: Rapid 2-D Resistivity & IP inversion using the least-squares method. Geotomo Software, Malaysia, (2012), 169.

. Olayinka A. and Yaramanci U., Assessment of the reliability of 2D inversion of apparent resistivity data. Geophysical Prospecting, 48, (2000), 293–316.

. Ebrahimi, M., Taleshi, A. A., Arab-Amiri, A., and M. Abbasinia. Two and Three-Dimonsional ERT Modelling for a Buried Tunnnel, Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS), 7(3), (2016), 118- 127.

. Al-Zubedi, A. S. Evaluation of five electrode arrays in imaging subsurface shallow targets: A case study, Iraqi Bulletin of Geology and Mining, 12, (2), (2016), 39- 46.

. Samouëlian, A., Cousin, I., Tabbagh, A., Bruand, A. and G. Richard. Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: A review, Soil Tillage Res., 83, (2005), 173- 193.

Published

2018-09-01

How to Cite

[1]
A. Ahmed Hassan, Emad Hamid Kadhim, and Muaiad Tahir Ahmed, “Performance of Various Electrical Resistivity Configurations for Detecting Buried Tunnels Using 2D Electrical Resistivity Tomography Modelling ”, DJES, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 14–21, Sep. 2018.